Skip to content

idiots!

September 12, 2011

stop misusing this quote!  jesus.

Advertisements
11 Comments
  1. September 12, 2011 2:01 am

    PMSL!!!!!

  2. September 12, 2011 2:39 am

    you think f word will publish the pingback? heh.

  3. September 12, 2011 8:58 am

    It always toasts my buns when I read somebody using that quote to justify trans ideology. It makes me want to scream. GRRRRR.

  4. kurukurushoujo permalink
    September 12, 2011 3:19 pm

    I see that they still don’t get that socialization exists.

  5. SheilaG permalink
    September 12, 2011 8:22 pm

    LOL. that mustard jar will never be the same again!
    And also the trans appropriation of Simone de Bouvior is out of herstorical context completely.
    It is woman who is forced to conform to patriarchal standards of femininity that she refers to, and not the biological fact of women. But again, trans is very weak on female biology and how female bodies actually function.

  6. yttik permalink
    September 12, 2011 10:27 pm

    LOL! Cute graphic.

    From the Misquoting Grey Poupon article: “Their voice is small, but by god it is vocal.”
    Yep, and visual too. You wouldn’t believe all the different mediums we can use to make our voices heard.

  7. September 12, 2011 11:33 pm

    more from the grey poupon fanclub:

    I can understand what leads some cis radical feminists to transphobia. Part of what sustains it is confused ignorance stemming from the uncritical acceptance of writers like Raymond, Sheila Jeffreys, Germaine Greer and Julie Bindel, who have each attempted to normalise transphobia as a part of radical feminist criticism. Part of it is lack of awareness that this is even an issue. Partly it is a lack of interaction between cis and trans feminists. And part of it is plain old hate. Disturbing blogs such as RadFemHub provide plenty of the latter.

    disturbing! LOL uncritical? LOL uncritical acceptance of sheila jeffreys, i love it. all the worlds problems stem from people accepting the most radical of the radical feminists without critical thought, intellectual honesty or consideration. did i say accepting? i meant rejecting.

  8. thebewilderness permalink
    September 13, 2011 7:58 pm

    “Partly it is a lack of interaction between cis and trans feminists.”

    That really is a huge problem, right there. That lack of interaction. Outside of the name calling and the death threats, I mean. Women who refuse to interact with men.

    It always seems to come down to that.

  9. yttik permalink
    September 14, 2011 1:27 am

    Hate at the Hub??! Is that like when a woman is “abusing” you by not doing your laundry? “Oppressing” you by asking you to put the seat down? “Hating” on you by failing to let you be the center of the universe?

  10. September 14, 2011 1:32 am

    LOL yes, just like that.

  11. October 30, 2011 7:12 pm

    I see that they still don’t get that socialization exists.

    I love this comment, it struck me as just so droll. But maybe because I came here searching for a reply to post on facebook which would have a snappy graphic. Miska saves the day, thank you!

    But in some twisted way, I think that they do (vaguely) gronk that socialization exists, but they erroneously assume socialization means “what I believe about myself to be true” rather than “what the entire world believes about myself to be true”. They don’t get that socialization comes from outside, and is inflicted on someone without their consent and without consulting them first.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: